The indirect evolutionary approach to explaining fair allocations
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:1300672)
Recommendations
Cites work
- An evolutionary analysis of backward and forward induction
- An impossibility result concerning \(n\)-person bargaining games
- Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining
- Considerations of Fairness and Strategy: Experimental Data from Sequential Games
- Evolutionary Games in Economics
- Evolutionary stability in asymmetric games
- Fairness in simple bargaining experiments
- Learning to be imperfect: The ultimatum game
Cited in
(49)- Evolution and ultimatum bargaining
- Aspiration adaptation in the ultimatum minigame.
- The evolutionary analysis of the ultimatum game based on the net-profit decision
- Is social responsibility for firms competing on quantity evolutionary stable?
- Coevolution of deception and preferences: Darwin and Nash meet Machiavelli
- Expectations of fairness and trust co-evolve in environments of partial information
- Sunk costs and fairness in incomplete information bargaining
- Evolutionarily stable in-group favoritism and out-group spite in intergroup conflict
- Social opportunities and the evolution of fairness
- What makes an allocation fair? Some experimental evidence.
- The evolutionary role of toughness in bargaining
- An indirect evolutionary justification of risk neutral bidding in fair division games
- Evolution of revenue preference for competing firms with nonlinear inverse demand
- Zero-knowledge cooperation in dilemma games
- Labelling, homophily and preference evolution
- Natural selection and social preferences
- Randomness and arbitrary coordination in the reactive ultimatum game
- Coevolution of fairness and spite on stochastic dynamics networks
- The spatial ultimatum game revisited
- Strong reciprocity, social structure, and the evolution of fair allocations in a simulated ultimatum game
- Generosity, selfishness and exploitation as optimal greedy strategies for resource sharing
- What to maximize if you must
- The dynamic evolution of preferences
- Equilibrium vengeance
- Evolution of fairness and coalition formation in three-person ultimatum games
- The effect of the stake size on the evolution of fairness
- Supply chain disruption management and evolutionarily stable strategies of retailers in the quantity-setting duopoly situation with homogeneous goods
- No switchbacks: Rethinking aspiration-based dynamics in the ultimatum game
- Empathy leads to fairness
- Identity, utility, and cooperative behaviour: an evolutionary perspective
- Bargaining with incomplete information: evolutionary stability in finite populations
- Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous ultimatum game
- Preference evolution and reciprocity
- Analogies, adaptation, and anomalies
- Why firms should care for customers
- Evolution of preferences in multiple populations
- A kin-selection model of fairness in heterogeneous populations
- Evolution and the ultimatum game
- Separating the hawks from the doves: evidence from continuous time laboratory games
- Changing behaviour under unfairness: an evolutionary model of the ultimatum game
- The evolution of fairness under an assortative matching rule in the ultimatum game
- Equilibrium selection and the dynamic evolution of preferences
- Indignation and the evolution of cooperation norms
- Naive analytics: the strategic advantage of algorithmic heuristics
- Evolution and Kantian morality
- Evolution of fairness in the dictator game by multilevel selection
- Two-speed evolution of strategies and preferences in symmetric games
- Market design with endogenous preferences
- Commitment in alternating offers bargaining
This page was built for publication: The indirect evolutionary approach to explaining fair allocations
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1300672)
