Wary of the worst: maximizing award guarantees when new claimants may arrive

DOI10.1016/J.GEB.2017.08.011zbMATH Open1415.91178OpenAlexW2751489129MaRDI QIDQ2411533FDOQ2411533

Patrick Harless

Publication date: 24 October 2017

Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/146446/7/146446.pdf

zbMATH Keywords

worst-case analysisconstrained equal awards ruleclaims problemTalmud ruleguarantee structures

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud
• A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud
• New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules
• On Dividing an Amount According to Individual Claims or Liabilities
• How bad is selfish routing?
• The Price of Stability for Network Design with Fair Cost Allocation
• Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey.
• The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
• Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update
• The worst absolute surplus loss in the problem of commons: random priority versus average cost
• Strategyproof sharing of submodular costs: budget balance versus efficiency
• Equivalence of axioms for bankruptcy problems
• The Fair Division of a Fixed Supply Among a Growing Population
• The price of anarchy of serial, average and incremental cost sharing
• The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards.
• Protective properties and the constrained equal awards rule for claims problems: A note
• Collective guarantee structures
• Guarantee structures for problems of fair division
• A unifying framework for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims
• The TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems
• New characterizations of a classical bankruptcy rule
• The price of anarchy is independent of the network topology
• Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• Lorenz rankings of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims
• The bankruptcy problem: A cooperative bargaining approach
• Social Welfare in One-Sided Matching Markets without Money
• Rationing in the presence of baselines
• Secured lower bound, composition up, and minimal rights first for bankruptcy problems
• Strategy-proof cost sharing under increasing returns: improvement of the supremal welfare loss
• Individual and collective opportunities
• On cost sharing in the provision of a binary and excludable public good

Cited In (1)

• Efficient mixtures of priority rules for assigning objects

Recommendations

• The average-of-awards rule for claims problems 👍 👎
• Vigilant measures of risk and the demand for contingent claims 👍 👎
• On the number of near-maximum insurance claims 👍 👎
• A proportional approach to claims problems with a guaranteed minimum 👍 👎
• Protective properties and the constrained equal awards rule for claims problems: A note 👍 👎
• Claim Timing andEx PostAdverse Selection 👍 👎
• Rationing rules for risky claims 👍 👎
• Resource allocations with guaranteed awards in claims problems 👍 👎
• Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: Wary of the worst: maximizing award guarantees when new claimants may arrive

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2411533)