The model proposed and studied in this article describes strategic communication between two senders and one receiver. The receiver selects between two alternatives according to the reports from the senders. The senders have an incentive to misreport the actual situation when it is against their interest, though this incurs some cost: further from the exact situation, higher the cost. The analysis of the existence and properties of perfect Bayesian equilibria in the model involves several additional assumptions, which are justified throughout the article. A starting observation is that the so-called babbling equilibria (characteristic for cheap talk) do not appear in the model. Furthermore, receiver-efficient equilibria (in particular, fully revealing equilibria, characteristic for signaling games) cannot appear if the beliefs of the decision-making receiver are unprejudiced. To remedy extra biased beliefs, the author introduces the notion of adversarial equilibrium (AE). Such an equilibrium always exists, is unique in terms of outcomes, and is either robust or equivalent to another AE that is additionally robust. Also, there exist AEs with unprejudiced beliefs. The notion of AE relies on the proper understanding of swing reports, that is, reports with the intent to persuade the receiver to make a decision in favor of the sender's interest that goes against the actual situation being reported. Some extensions of the model to incorporate uncertainty of beliefs and allow senders to withdraw information are addressed at the end of the article.
- A model of electoral competition with incomplete information
- A model of expertise
- All-Pay Contests
- Belief-based refinements in signalling games
- Cheap Talk and Sequential Equilibria in Signaling Games
- Coalition-proof Nash equilibria. I: Concepts
- Credulity, lies, and costly talk
- Game theory
- Influential news and policy-making
- Lies, damned lies, and political campaigns
- Multiple Referrals and Multidimensional Cheap Talk
- Naive audience and communication bias
- On the Strategic Stability of Equilibria
- Perfect sequential equilibrium
- Persuasion as a contest
- Perturbed communication games with honest senders and naive receivers
- Selecting Cheap-Talk Equilibria
- Strategic communication with lying costs
- Strategic communication with reporting costs
- Strategic stability of equilibria in multi-sender signaling games
- Success in contests
- The all-pay auction with complete information
This page was built for publication: Competition in costly talk
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6090464)