The Pareto frontier of inefficiency in mechanism design

From MaRDI portal
Publication:777959

DOI10.1007/978-3-030-35389-6_14zbMATH Open1435.91061arXiv1809.03454OpenAlexW2989950847MaRDI QIDQ777959FDOQ777959


Authors: Aris Filos-Ratsikas, Yiannis Giannakopoulos, Philip Lazos Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 30 June 2020

Published in: Mathematics of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We study the trade-off between the Price of Anarchy (PoA) and the Price of Stability (PoS) in mechanism design, in the prototypical problem of unrelated machine scheduling. We give bounds on the space of feasible mechanisms with respect to the above metrics, and observe that two fundamental mechanisms, namely the First-Price (FP) and the Second-Price (SP), lie on the two opposite extrema of this boundary. Furthermore, for the natural class of anonymous task-independent mechanisms, we completely characterize the PoA/PoS Pareto frontier; we design a class of optimal mechanisms mathcalSPalpha that lie exactly on this frontier. In particular, these mechanisms range smoothly, with respect to parameter alphageq1 across the frontier, between the First-Price (mathcalSP1) and Second-Price (mathcalSPinfty) mechanisms. En route to these results, we also provide a definitive answer to an important question related to the scheduling problem, namely whether non-truthful mechanisms can provide better makespan guarantees in the equilibrium, compared to truthful ones. We answer this question in the negative, by proving that the Price of Anarchy of all scheduling mechanisms is at least n, where n is the number of machines.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.03454




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (4)





This page was built for publication: The Pareto frontier of inefficiency in mechanism design

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q777959)