Characterizations of scoring methods for preference aggregation
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- Preference fusion when the number of alternatives exceeds two: Indirect scoring procedures
- Scoring rules and social choice properties: some characterizations
- Scoring rules for judgment aggregation
- Axiomatic characterization of committee scoring rules
- Consistency of scoring rules: a reinvestigation of composition-consistency
Cited in
(33)- Some impossibilities of ranking in generalized tournaments
- Is majority consistency possible?
- Consistent approval-based multi-winner rules
- Bivariate scoring rules: unifying the characterizations of positional scoring rules and Kemeny's rule
- The costs of implementing the majority principle: The golden voting rule
- On the ranking of a Swiss system chess team tournament
- Characteristic properties of list proportional representation systems
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4005933 (Why is no real title available?)
- An axiomatic characterization of the Borda mean rule
- Pairwise consensus and the Borda rule
- Characterizations of the 3-cycle count and backward length of a tournament
- Group decisions from individual rankings: the Borda-Condorcet rule
- Consistency without neutrality in voting rules: When is a vote an average?
- Sensitivity analyses and measurements for group decisions using weighted scoring rules
- General transitivity conditions for fuzzy reciprocal preference matrices.
- Positionalist voting rules: a general definition and axiomatic characterizations
- Further analysis on matrix operation of AHP
- Preference fusion when the number of alternatives exceeds two: Indirect scoring procedures
- Characterizing best-worst voting systems in the scoring context
- An impossibility theorem for paired comparisons
- A graph interpretation of the least squares ranking method
- Duplication in OWA-generated positional aggregation rules
- Scoring indices, top-truncated preferences, and splitting invariance
- Selection of priority areas in research and development
- Paired comparisons analysis: an axiomatic approach to ranking methods
- Judgement and ranking: living with hidden bias
- Fair elimination-type competitions
- University rankings from the revealed preferences of the applicants
- Incomplete paired comparisons in case of multiple choice and general log-concave probability density functions
- Two characterizations of the dense rank
- Distance rationalization of voting rules
- Axiomatizations of approval voting
- Stable and emergent network topologies: a structural approach
This page was built for publication: Characterizations of scoring methods for preference aggregation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1392451)
