Distance rationalization of voting rules
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- Rationalizations of Condorcet-consistent rules via distances of Hamming type
- Distance rationalization of anonymous and homogeneous voting rules
- Does avoiding bad voting rules result in good ones?
- A distance-based comparison of basic voting rules
- A comparison of some distance-based choice rules in ranking environments
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 44383 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 50740 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1059780 (Why is no real title available?)
- A Consistent Extension of Condorcet’s Election Principle
- Absolute and monotonic norms
- Bargaining solutions as social compromises
- Characterizations of scoring methods for preference aggregation
- Consensus theories. An oriented survey
- Distances and consensus rankings
- Encyclopedia of Distances
- Exact analysis of Dodgson elections
- Extending Condorcet's rule
- Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
- Metric rationalisation of social choice functions according to principles of social choice
- More on the Preservation of Preference Proximity and Anonymous Social Choice
- On the Borda-Kendall Consensus Method for Priority Ranking Problems
- Preference Proximity and Anonymous Social Choice
- Preference Structures. II: Distances Between Asymmetric Relations
- Preference structures I: Distances between transitive preference relations†
- Priority Ranking and Consensus Formation
- Rationalizations of Condorcet-consistent rules via distances of Hamming type
- Social Choice Scoring Functions
- Social choice and individual values
- Social compromise and social metrics
- Some Remarks on Dodgson's Voting Rule
- Some general results on the metric rationalization for social decision rules
- Some measures of closeness to unanimity and their implications
- The Borda Rule and Pareto Stability: A Comment
- The threshold aggregation
- Transitive closure, proximity and intransitivities
- Voting rules as statistical estimators
- Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election
Cited in
(20)- Voting: a machine learning approach
- Rationalizations of Voting Rules
- Rationalizable voting
- Multi-attribute proportional representation
- What's so special about Euclidean distance? A characterization with applications to mobility and spatial voting
- Representations of votes based on pairwise information: monotonicity versus consistency
- A distance-based comparison of basic voting rules
- Distance rationalization of anonymous and homogeneous voting rules
- Isomorphic Distances Among Elections
- A comparison of some distance-based choice rules in ranking environments
- On stable rules for selecting committees
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5973499 (Why is no real title available?)
- Approximating optimal social choice under metric preferences
- A characterization of the rational mean neat voting rules
- Does avoiding bad voting rules result in good ones?
- An algorithmic view of voting
- Monotonicity-based consensus states for the monometric rationalisation of ranking rules and how they are affected by ties
- Measuring the cohesiveness of preferences: an axiomatic analysis
- Aggregation over metric spaces: proposing and voting in elections, budgeting, and legislation
- On the manipulability of a class of social choice functions: plurality \(k\)th rules
This page was built for publication: Distance rationalization of voting rules
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q892848)
