Condorcet efficiency and constant scoring rules
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
Cited in
(21)- The unexpected behavior of plurality rule
- The likelihood of monotonicity paradoxes in run-off elections
- The expected likelihood of transitivity: A survey
- The effectiveness of weighted scoring rules when pairwise majority rule cycles exist.
- Monotonicity paradoxes in three-candidate elections using scoring elimination rules
- Constant scoring rules, Condorcet criteria and single-peaked preferences
- Voting cycles, plurality rule and strategic manipulation
- On the probability of electing the Condorcet loser
- The expected likelihood of transitivity for probabilistic choosers with single-peaked preferences
- Condorcet efficiency of simple voting rules for large electorates
- Exploiting polyhedral symmetries in social choice
- Probability calculations under the IAC hypothesis
- The sensitivity of weight selection for scoring rules to profile proximity to single-peaked preferences
- Should voters be required to rank candidates in an election?
- The impact of voters' preference diversity on the probability of some electoral outcomes
- The Effect of Closeness on the Election of a Pairwise Majority Rule Winner
- From Gehrlein-Fishburn’s Method on Frequency Representation to a Direct Proof of Ehrhart’s extended Conjecture
- IAC Probability Calculations in Voting Theory: Progress Report
- The Condorcet efficiency of Borda Rule with anonymous voters
- Bivariate scoring rules: unifying the characterizations of positional scoring rules and Kemeny's rule
- Plurality rule and Condorcet criterion over restricted domains
This page was built for publication: Condorcet efficiency and constant scoring rules
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1162267)