Lottery versus all-pay auction contests: a revenue dominance theorem
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2437170
Recommendations
Cites work
- Asymmetric contests with general technologies
- Contest success functions: an extension
- Effort maximization in asymmetric contest games with heterogeneous contestants
- Favoritism in asymmetric contests: head starts and handicaps
- Strategy and dynamics in contests
- The all-pay auction with complete information
- Tie-breaks and bid-caps in all-pay auctions
Cited in
(17)- Optimally biased contests with draws
- Discrimination in contests: a survey
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5824060 (Why is no real title available?)
- Ex ante heterogeneity in all-pay many-player auctions with Pareto distribution of costs
- How lotteries outperform auctions
- Dual sourcing with price discovery
- Revenue ranking of optimally biased contests: the case of two players
- Contests with small noise and the robustness of the all-pay auction
- Choosing fair lotteries to defeat the competition
- Complete-rent-dissipation contest design
- Politicians, governed versus non-governed interest groups and rent dissipation
- On optimal head starts in all-pay auctions
- A note on rent dissipation in lottery contests
- Sorting in iterated incumbency contests
- Equity and effectiveness of optimal taxation in contests under an all-pay auction
- Tullock contests may be revenue superior to auctions in a symmetric setting
- A tug-of-war team contest
This page was built for publication: Lottery versus all-pay auction contests: a revenue dominance theorem
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2437170)