Surprising gifts: theory and laboratory evidence
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Surprising gifts: theory and laboratory evidence)
Recommendations
Cites work
- A model of reference-dependent preferences
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
- Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty
- Dynamic psychological games
- Experimental results on ultimatum games with incomplete information
- Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness
- From Ultimatum Bargaining to Dictatorship-an Experimental Study of Four Games Varying in Veto Power
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4081235 (Why is no real title available?)
- Measuring beliefs in an experimental lost wallet game
- Monotone Comparative Statics
- Promises and Partnership
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
- Psychological games and sequential rationality
- Shaping beliefs in experimental markets for expert services: guilt aversion and the impact of promises and money-burning options
- Social image and the 50-50 norm: a theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects
- Strict monotonicity in comparative statics
- Testing guilt aversion
- The framing of games and the psychology of play
- Why Do People Keep Their Promises? An Experimental Test of Two Explanations
Cited in
(17)- Promises and expectations
- Promises, expectations \& causation
- Gratitude, conscience, and reciprocity: models of supplier motivation when quality is non-contractible
- When do the expectations of others matter? Experimental evidence on distributional justice and guilt aversion
- Common belief in rationality in psychological games. Belief-dependent utility and the limits of strategic reasoning
- Responding to (un)reasonable requests by an authority
- The rationale of in-group favoritism: an experimental test of three explanations
- The Ellsberg paradox: a challenge to quantum decision theory?
- Classical and belief-based gift exchange models: theory and evidence
- Testing guilt aversion with an exogenous shift in beliefs
- A note on testing guilt aversion
- Useful conclusions from surprising results
- Personal information disclosure under competition for benefits: is sharing caring?
- Guilt aversion in (new) games: does partners' payoff vulnerability matter?
- Disclosure of belief-dependent preferences in a trust game
- Strategy vs. direct-response method: evidence from a large online experiment on simple social dilemmas
- Testing guilt aversion
This page was built for publication: Surprising gifts: theory and laboratory evidence
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q900415)
