Looking smart versus playing dumb in common-value auctions
From MaRDI portal
Publication:992056
DOI10.1007/s00199-009-0491-8zbMath1195.91061OpenAlexW2142656498MaRDI QIDQ992056
Publication date: 8 September 2010
Published in: Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0491-8
Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models (91B26) Economics of information (91B44) Dynamic games (91A25) Signaling and communication in game theory (91A28)
Related Items (4)
Optimal bidding in auctions from a game theory perspective ⋮ Updating toward the signal ⋮ Collusive communication schemes in a first-price auction ⋮ On the choice of obtaining and disclosing the common value in auctions
Cites Work
- The insider's curse
- Information revelation in auctions
- Information acquisition in auctions: Sealed bids vs. open bids
- Private value perturbations and informational advantage in common value auctions
- The value of information in a sealed-bid auction
- A common value auction model with endogeneous entry and information acquisition
- Can the seller benefit from an insider in common-value auctions?
- Mid-auction information acquisition
- Private information revelation in common-value auctions
- Competitive bidding and proprietary information
- A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding
- Auctions for Oil and Gas Leases with an Informed Bidder and a Random Reservation Price
- Information Acquisition in Auctions
This page was built for publication: Looking smart versus playing dumb in common-value auctions