Implementing Lindahl allocations by a withholding mechanism
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1207011
DOI10.1016/0304-4068(93)90046-NzbMath0770.90013MaRDI QIDQ1207011
Publication date: 4 May 1993
Published in: Journal of Mathematical Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Related Items
On informational efficiency and incentive aspects of generalized ratio equilibria, Virtual implementation in incomplete information environments with infinite alternatives and types, Implementation with renegotiation when preferences and feasible sets are state dependent, Anonymous implementation of the Lindahl correspondence: possibility and impossibility results, Double implementation of linear cost share equilibrium allocations
Cites Work
- Completely feasible and continuous implementation of the Lindahl correspondence with a message space of minimal dimension
- Completely feasible and continuous implementation of the Lindahl correspondence with any number of goods
- On the constrained Walrasian and Lindahl correspondences
- Subgame perfect implementation: A necessary and almost sufficient condition
- Nontransitive-nontotal consumer theory
- Generalizations of the FKKM theorem and the Ky Fan minimax inequality, with applications to maximal elements, price equilibrium, and complementarity
- Outcome Functions Yielding Walrasian and Lindahl Allocations at Nash Equilibrium Points
- Nash Implementation Using Undominated Strategies
- Implementation of the Lindahl Correspondence by a Single-Valued, Feasible, and Continuous Mechanism
- Subgame Perfect Implementation
- Efficiency and Decentralization in the Pure Theory of Public Goods
- A Simple Incentive Compatible Scheme for Attaining Lindahl Allocations
- Optimal Allocation of Public Goods: A Solution to the "Free Rider" Problem
- Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality
- Nash-Implementation of the Lindahl Correspondence with Decreasing Returns to Scale Technologies
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
