Condorcet meets Bentham
From MaRDI portal
Publication:492869
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5480956 (Why is no real title available?)
- Asymptotic utilitarianism in scoring rules
- Conditions for Voting Equilibria in Continuous Voter Distributions
- Egalitarianism and utilitarianism in committees of representatives
- Majority rule and general decision rules
- Mathematical Properties of the Banzhaf Power Index
- Multi-stage voting, sequential elimination and Condorcet consistency
- One person/one vote is not efficient given information on factions
- Ordinal versus cardinal voting rules: a mechanism design approach
- Pareto efficiency and weighted majority rules
- The (sub-)optimality of the majority rule
- The welfare consequences of strategic voting in two commonly used parliamentary agendas
- Unlikelihood of Condorcet's paradox in a large society
- Voting rules as statistical estimators
Cited in
(10)- Popular support for social evaluation functions
- Condorcet meets Ellsberg
- Cartan meets Chaplygin
- Formal utilitarianism and range voting
- The greatest unhappiness of the least number
- Generalized majority rules: utilitarian welfare in large but finite populations
- Weighted representative democracy
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4108443 (Why is no real title available?)
- Rawls and Bentham reconciled
- Asymptotic utilitarianism in scoring rules
This page was built for publication: Condorcet meets Bentham
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q492869)