Preference aggregation theory without acyclicity: the core without majority dissatisfaction
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:536092)
Abstract: Acyclicity of individual preferences is a minimal assumption in social choice theory. We replace that assumption by the direct assumption that preferences have maximal elements on a fixed agenda. We show that the core of a simple game is nonempty for all profiles of such preferences if and only if the number of alternatives in the agenda is less than the Nakamura number of the game. The same is true if we replace the core by the core without majority dissatisfaction, obtained by deleting from the agenda all the alternatives that are non-maximal for all players in a winning coalition. Unlike the core, the core without majority dissatisfaction depends only on the players' sets of maximal elements and is included in the union of such sets. A result for an extended framework gives another sense in which the core without majority dissatisfaction behaves better than the core.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3884141 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 46153 (Why is no real title available?)
- A Representation Theorem for "Preference for Flexibility"
- A note on the core of voting games
- A note on the non-emptiness of the stability set when individual preferences are weak orders
- A systematic approach to the construction of non-empty choice sets
- Acyclic social choice from finite sets
- Arrow's theorem and Turing computability
- Arrow's theorem, countably many agents, and more visible invisible dictators
- Classical recursion theory. The theory of functions and sets of natural numbers.
- Coalitionally strategyproof functions depend only on the most-preferred alternatives
- Computability of simple games: A characterization and application to the core
- Necessary and sufficient conditions for l-stability of games in constitutional form
- ON THE CHACTERISTIC NUMBERS OF VOTING GAMES
- Rationalizing Choice Functions By Multiple Rationales
- Social choice and electoral competition in the general spatial model
- Social choice and individual values
- Sophisticated voting outcomes and agenda control
- Stability of decision systems under majority rule
- The Banks set in infinite spaces
- The Nakamura numbers for computable simple games
- The stability set of voting games: Classification and genericity results
- The vetoers in a simple game with ordinal preferences
- Three theorems on recursive enumeration. I. Decomposition. II. Maximal set. III. Enumeration without duplication
- Voting games and acyclic collective choice rules
Cited in
(6)- Computability of simple games: a complete investigation of the sixty-four possibilities
- Non-emptiness of the core: Low multi-dimensional decisions spaces and one-dimensional preferences
- Committees under qualified majority rules: the one-core stability index
- The stability of decision making in committees: the one-core
- Social equilibrium and cycles on compact sets
- Acyclic social choice from finite sets
This page was built for publication: Preference aggregation theory without acyclicity: the core without majority dissatisfaction
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q536092)