Distance rationalization of voting rules
From MaRDI portal
Publication:892848
DOI10.1007/S00355-015-0892-5zbMATH Open1341.91066OpenAlexW2011136799WikidataQ61586149 ScholiaQ61586149MaRDI QIDQ892848FDOQ892848
Authors: Edith Elkind, Piotr Faliszewski, Arkadii Slinko 
Publication date: 12 November 2015
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-015-0892-5
Recommendations
- Rationalizations of Condorcet-consistent rules via distances of Hamming type
- Distance rationalization of anonymous and homogeneous voting rules
- Does avoiding bad voting rules result in good ones?
- A distance-based comparison of basic voting rules
- A comparison of some distance-based choice rules in ranking environments
Cites Work
- Social choice and individual values
- Priority Ranking and Consensus Formation
- Preference structures I: Distances between transitive preference relations†
- Preference Structures. II: Distances Between Asymmetric Relations
- Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Some general results on the metric rationalization for social decision rules
- Characterizations of scoring methods for preference aggregation
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A Consistent Extension of Condorcet’s Election Principle
- The Borda Rule and Pareto Stability: A Comment
- Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
- Encyclopedia of Distances
- Some measures of closeness to unanimity and their implications
- Extending Condorcet's rule
- Exact analysis of Dodgson elections
- On the Borda-Kendall Consensus Method for Priority Ranking Problems
- Social Choice Scoring Functions
- Voting rules as statistical estimators
- Transitive closure, proximity and intransitivities
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Rationalizations of Condorcet-consistent rules via distances of Hamming type
- The threshold aggregation
- Absolute and monotonic norms
- Social compromise and social metrics
- Metric rationalisation of social choice functions according to principles of social choice
- Preference Proximity and Anonymous Social Choice
- Bargaining solutions as social compromises
- Consensus theories. An oriented survey
- Distances and consensus rankings
- Some Remarks on Dodgson's Voting Rule
- More on the Preservation of Preference Proximity and Anonymous Social Choice
Cited In (19)
- On stable rules for selecting committees
- Multi-attribute proportional representation
- Aggregation over Metric Spaces: Proposing and Voting in Elections, Budgeting, and Legislation
- Isomorphic Distances Among Elections
- On the manipulability of a class of social choice functions: plurality \(k\)th rules
- What's so special about Euclidean distance? A characterization with applications to mobility and spatial voting
- A distance-based comparison of basic voting rules
- Does avoiding bad voting rules result in good ones?
- A comparison of some distance-based choice rules in ranking environments
- Voting: a machine learning approach
- Representations of votes based on pairwise information: monotonicity versus consistency
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Distance rationalization of anonymous and homogeneous voting rules
- Rationalizations of Voting Rules
- Rationalizable voting
- A characterization of the rational mean neat voting rules
- Monotonicity-based consensus states for the monometric rationalisation of ranking rules and how they are affected by ties
- Approximating optimal social choice under metric preferences
- Measuring the cohesiveness of preferences: an axiomatic analysis
This page was built for publication: Distance rationalization of voting rules
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q892848)
