Iterated dominance revisited
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2059064
DOI10.1007/s00199-020-01275-zzbMath1479.91054OpenAlexW3082024010MaRDI QIDQ2059064
Amanda Friedenberg, H. Jerome Keisler
Publication date: 13 December 2021
Published in: Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-020-01275-z
rationalizabilityepistemic game theoryiterated dominancetype structuresrationality and common belief of rationality
Related Items
Weak belief and permissibility, The existence of universal qualitative belief spaces, Cautious belief and iterated admissibility, Complete Conditional Type Structures (Extended Abstract), Optimism and pessimism in strategic interactions under ignorance
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Admissibility and assumption
- Rationalizability in continuous games
- When do type structures contain all hierarchies of beliefs?
- An impossibility theorem on beliefs in games
- Invariance to representation of information
- Intrinsic correlation in games
- Formulation of Bayesian analysis for games with incomplete information
- The Bayesian foundations of solution concepts of games
- On solutions of Bayesian games
- We can't disagree forever
- Topology-free typology of beliefs
- Order independence for iterated weak dominance
- Hierarchies of beliefs and common knowledge
- Strong belief and forward induction reasoning.
- Coherent beliefs are not always types.
- Weak belief and permissibility
- On the relationship between hierarchy and type morphisms
- Finitely additive beliefs and universal type spaces
- Forward induction reasoning revisited
- Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection
- Rationalizable Strategic Behavior
- Rationalizability and Correlated Equilibria
- The Robustness of Equilibria to Incomplete Information
- Epistemic Conditions for Nash Equilibrium
- Admissibility in Games
- Existence and Uniqueness of Maximal Reductions Under Iterated Strict Dominance
- Games with Incomplete Information Played by “Bayesian” Players, I–III Part I. The Basic Model