Admissibility in Games

From MaRDI portal
Publication:5456469

DOI10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00835.xzbMath1133.91330OpenAlexW2158026954MaRDI QIDQ5456469

Amanda Friedenberg, H. Jerome Keisler, Adam Brandenburger

Publication date: 8 April 2008

Published in: Econometrica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00835.x




Related Items

Foundations of probabilityAdmissibility and assumptionLexicographic beliefs and assumptionRobust perfect equilibrium in large gamesOn redundant types and Bayesian formulation of incomplete informationA space of lexicographic preferencesWhen do type structures contain all hierarchies of beliefs?Lexicographic probability, conditional probability, and nonstandard probabilityUniversality of the Epstein-Wang type structureAn epistemic characterization of MACARationalizability and logical inferenceAn impossibility theorem on beliefs in gamesCharacterizing solution concepts in terms of common knowledge of rationalityA characterization of Brandenburger-Friedenberg-Keisler's assumptionStrategic reasoning in persuasion games: an experimentThe power of paradox: some recent developments in interactive epistemologyWeak belief and permissibilityThe role of aggregate information in a binary threshold gameRational behavior under correlated uncertaintyDirected lexicographic rationalizabilityCoordination via delay: theory and experimentObservability, dominance, and induction in learning modelsWeak assumption and iterative admissibilityThe existence of universal qualitative belief spacesCommon assumption of rationalityLexicographic agreeing to disagree and perfect equilibriumCautious belief and iterated admissibilityStrategic and structural uncertainty in robust implementationEpistemic foundation of the backward induction paradoxComplete Conditional Type Structures (Extended Abstract)The reasoning-based expected utility procedureIterated elimination proceduresSimple mechanisms and preferences for honestyUnnamed ItemUnnamed ItemUnnamed ItemOn the epistemic foundation for iterated weak dominance: an analysis in a logic of individual and collective attitudesDominance-solvable common-value large auctionsOn the complexity of iterated weak dominance in constant-sum gamesSubstantive assumptions in interaction: a logical perspectivePossibility and permissibilityScoring rule voting games and dominance solvabilityMinimal belief revision leads to backward inductionHierarchies of ambiguous beliefsCommon knowledge of payoff uncertainty in gamesIterated admissibility through forcing in strategic belief modelsLexicographic expected utility with a subjective state spaceIterated regret minimization: a new solution conceptTHE POWER OF KNOWLEDGE IN GAMESIterated strict dominance in general gamesThe context of the gameA minimal logic for interactive epistemologyAssume-admissible synthesisOn the equivalence between iterated application of choice rules and common belief of applying these rulesComprehensive rationalizabilitySelf-admissible setsThe refined best-response correspondence in normal form gamesAn algorithm for proper rationalizabilityEpistemic equivalence of extended belief hierarchiesEvolutionary selection against iteratively weakly dominated strategiesCharacterizing permissibility, proper rationalizability, and iterated admissibility by incomplete informationA rational way of playing: revision theory for strategic interactionAlgorithms for cautious reasoning in gamesEpistemically robust strategy subsetsPerfect forward inductionStrategic cautiousness as an expression of robustness to ambiguityLanguage and coordination gamesIterated dominance revisitedA Dynamic Analysis of Interactive RationalityRevenue comparison of discrete private-value auctions via weak dominanceCommon theoriesLogic and Game TheoryAgreeing to disagree with conditional probability systemsFrom Lawvere to Brandenburger-Keisler: interactive forms of diagonalization and self-referenceOptimism and pessimism in strategic interactions under ignoranceThe role of monotonicity in the epistemic analysis of strategic gamesTransparent Restrictions on Beliefs and Forward-Induction Reasoning in Games with Asymmetric Information