Fee versus royalty reconsidered
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2577446
DOI10.1016/j.geb.2004.09.005zbMath1117.91342OpenAlexW2098170419MaRDI QIDQ2577446
Publication date: 22 December 2005
Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2004.09.005
Related Items (25)
General licensing schemes for a cost-reducing innovation ⋮ The Shapley value of a patent licensing game: the asymptotic equivalence to non-cooperative results ⋮ Privatization in the presence of patent licensing ⋮ Profit-sharing licensing ⋮ Licensing cost‐reducing innovations under supply function competition ⋮ On the core of a patent licensing game ⋮ Exclusive and non-exclusive licensing with shelving ⋮ Bargaining outcomes in patent licensing: asymptotic results in a general Cournot market ⋮ Licensing process innovations when losers' messages determine royalty rates ⋮ Stable bargaining outcomes in patent licensing: a cooperative game approach without side payments ⋮ License auctions with royalty contracts for (winners and) losers ⋮ Foreign investigations in the field of game-theoretic analysis of innovations ⋮ Dilemma of quality information disclosure in technology licensing ⋮ On the licensing of a technology with unknown use ⋮ Licensing a common value innovation when signaling strength may backfire ⋮ Location equilibrium with asymmetric firms: the role of licensing ⋮ Royalty licensing ⋮ Per unit vs. ad valorem royalty licensing ⋮ Comparison of dual-channel supply chain structures: e-commerce platform as different roles ⋮ Stable profit sharing in a patent licensing game: General bargaining outcomes ⋮ Technology licensing under optimal tax policy ⋮ Optimal pricing policy design for selling cost-reducing innovation in Cournot games ⋮ Patent licensing in a Cournot oligopoly: general results ⋮ Drastic innovations and multiplicity of optimal licensing policies ⋮ Optimal licensing of uncertain patents in the shadow of litigation
Cites Work
This page was built for publication: Fee versus royalty reconsidered