Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation

DOI10.1016/J.GEB.2016.01.001MaRDI QIDQ5964693zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Franz Dietrich

Publication date 1 March 2016

Published in Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.01.001

zbMATH Keywords

agenda manipulationcharacterization theoremsdescription-sensitivityimpossibility theoremsjudgment aggregationmultiple issues

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14)

Recommendations

• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
• Complexity of judgment aggregation
• Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
• Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
• Judgment aggregation without full rationality

Cites work

• A generalised model of judgment aggregation
• A measure of distance between judgment sets
• A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
• Abstract Arrowian aggregation
• Aggregation of binary evaluations
• Aggregation of binary evaluations: a Borda-like approach
• Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
• Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
• Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
• Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
• Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
• Geometric models of consistent judgement aggregation
• Introduction to judgment aggregation
• Judgment aggregation in search for the truth
• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
• Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
• Majority voting on restricted domains
• Many-valued judgment aggregation: characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary
• Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
• Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
• On the theory of aggregation
• Order restricted preferences and majority rule
• Premise-based versus outcome-based information aggregation
• Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
• Scoring rules for judgment aggregation
• The Condorcet jur(ies) theorem
• The Condorcet set: majority voting over interconnected propositions
• The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation

Cited in

(20)

• Manipulation of choice (agenda theory)
• Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. I: General agendas
• Premise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice
• Strategic manipulation in judgment aggregation under higher-level reasoning
• Complexity of control in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules
• Majority rule in the absence of a majority
• Truth-tracking judgment aggregation over interconnected issues
• Strategyproof judgment aggregation under partial information
• The Borda count and agenda manipulation
• A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties
• Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
• Introduction to judgment aggregation
• Sequential voting and agenda manipulation
• Path-disruption games: bribery and a probabilistic model
• Agenda-Manipulation in Ranking
• Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
• Complexity of manipulation and bribery in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules
• Decision framing in judgment aggregation
• The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications

This page was built for publication: Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5964693)