Secure implementation in allotment economies
DOI10.1016/j.geb.2009.04.023zbMath1197.91119OpenAlexW2171498154MaRDI QIDQ844906
Olivier Bochet, Toyotaka Sakai
Publication date: 5 February 2010
Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2009.04.023
coalition-proof Nash equilibriumstrategy-proofnessfair allocationpriority ruleNash implementationuniform rulesecure implementationsingle-peaked preference
Special types of economic equilibria (91B52) Special types of economic markets (including Cournot, Bertrand) (91B54) Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)
Related Items (9)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Secure implementation in Shapley-Scarf housing markets
- Secure implementation experiments: Do strategy-proof mechanisms really work?
- Coalition-proof Nash equilibria. I: Concepts
- Rationing a commodity along fixed paths
- On the coalition-proofness of the Pareto frontier of the set of Nash equilibria
- On coalition-proof Nash equilibria in common agency games
- Resource-monotonic solutions to the problem of fair division when preferences are single-peaked
- Consistent solutions to the problem of fair division when preferences are single-peaked
- Strategy-proof allotment rules
- Resource-monotonic allocation when preferences are single-peaked
- Coalition-proofness and dominance relations
- Secure implementation in economies with indivisible objects and money
- A simple characterization of the uniform rule
- Pairwise strategy-proofness and self-enforcing manipulation
- Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality
- The Division Problem with Single-Peaked Preferences: A Characterization of the Uniform Allocation Rule
This page was built for publication: Secure implementation in allotment economies