A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 02:37, 1 February 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240129110113)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:1601892

DOI10.1023/A:1014490210693zbMath1002.68172OpenAlexW2171853123MaRDI QIDQ1601892

Leila Amgoud, Claudette Cayrol

Publication date: 27 June 2002

Published in: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014490210693




Related Items (79)

Using arguments for making and explaining decisionsReasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworksPreferences in artificial intelligenceTwo approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attackProbabilistic argumentationArgumentation for Practical Reasoning: An Axiomatic ApproachWeighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in TwitterInference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentationAdmissibility in Probabilistic ArgumentationEquivalence in logic-based argumentationOn the Complexity of Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation FrameworksMinimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentationAFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacksSyntactic reasoning with conditional probabilities in deductive argumentationIntegrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analysesFundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with prioritiesSemantic-based construction of arguments: an answer set programming approachValue-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logicOn efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworksOn incompleteness in abstract argumentation: complexity and expressivenessExtension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworksIntrinsic argument strength in structured argumentation: a principled approachHow Dirty Is Your Relational Database? An Axiomatic ApproachThe Logical Handling of Threats, Rewards, Tips, and WarningsOn the Acceptability of Incompatible ArgumentsDialectical Proof Theories for the Credulous Prudent Preferred Semantics of ArgumentationClassical logic, argument and dialecticCharacterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relationsInstantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and propertiesAlgorithms for generating arguments and counterarguments in propositional logicOn bipolarity in argumentation frameworksPostulates for logic-based argumentation systemsPreferences and Assumption-Based Argumentation for Conflict-Free Normative AgentsDefeasible Argumentation Support for an Extended BDI ArchitectureWhere logic and agents meetSCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semanticsOn the Decomposition of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and the Complexity of Naive-based SemanticsAlgorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semanticsRevealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applicationsUses and computation of imprecise probabilities from statistical data and expert argumentsTwo Roles of Preferences in Argumentation FrameworksModeling time and valuation in structured argumentation frameworksA characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentationt-DeLP: an argumentation-based temporal defeasible logic programming frameworkArgumentation frameworks as constraint satisfaction problemsA Metamathematical Model for A/O Opposition in Scientific InquiryAssessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theoriesReduction-Based Approaches to Implement Modgil’s Extended Argumentation FrameworksWeighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity resultsOn the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instanceMeta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniquesEvaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphsTowards Context Sensitive Defeasible RulesUnnamed ItemAlgorithms for Effective Argumentation in Classical Propositional Logic: A Connection Graph ApproachValid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacksAn argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge basesPractical reasoning using values: an argumentative approach based on a hierarchy of valuesA formal framework for deliberated judgmentOn the Gradual Acceptability of Arguments in Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Frameworks with Degrees of TrustExtracting the Core of a Persuasion Dialog to Evaluate Its QualityAn Algorithm for Generating Arguments in Classical Predicate LogicEvaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semanticsAudiences in argumentation frameworksOn the evaluation of argumentation formalismsArgumentation in artificial intelligenceOn principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semanticsComputational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraintsOn the merging of Dung's argumentation systemsA new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworksUnderstanding the Abstract Dialectical FrameworkComplexity of fundamental problems in probabilistic abstract argumentation: beyond independenceOn the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentationA formal analysis of interest-based negotiationEncoding deductive argumentation in quantified Boolean formulaeBipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understandingPolicy-based inconsistency management in relational databasesRich preference-based argumentation frameworksProbabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation







This page was built for publication: A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments