The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review
From MaRDI portal
Publication:383023
DOI10.1007/S11229-011-0025-3zbMath1275.91049OpenAlexW1490088998MaRDI QIDQ383023
Publication date: 25 November 2013
Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27596/1/The_theory_of_judgment_aggregation_%28LSERO%29.pdf
democracysocial choice theoryjudgment aggregationArrow's impossibility theoremCondorcet's paradoxdiscursive dilemma
Related Items (29)
The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation ⋮ Logic and majority voting ⋮ On Aggregating Probabilistic Evidence ⋮ Introduction to Judgment Aggregation ⋮ Arrow on domain conditions: a fruitful road to travel ⋮ The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework ⋮ Complexity of control in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules ⋮ Complexity of manipulation and bribery in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules ⋮ Metrizable ordinal proximity measures and their aggregation ⋮ Complexity of manipulation and bribery in premise-based judgment aggregation with simple formulas ⋮ Infinite-population approval voting: a proposal ⋮ Quota rules for incomplete judgments ⋮ Approximately classic judgement aggregation ⋮ Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation ⋮ The Complexity Landscape of Outcome Determination in Judgment Aggregation ⋮ Judgments aggregation by a sequential majority procedure ⋮ Judgment aggregation in nonmonotonic logic ⋮ Social choice rules driven by propositional logic ⋮ Introduction to judgment aggregation ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Judgment aggregation and minimal change: a model of consensus formation by belief revision ⋮ Collective opinion as tendency towards consensus ⋮ Truth approximation, belief merging, and peer disagreement ⋮ \textsc{influence}: a partizan scoring game on graphs ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ An application of Peircean triadic logic: modelling vagueness ⋮ Strategyproof judgment aggregation under partial information ⋮ Social Choice Theory ⋮ Strategic manipulation in judgment aggregation under higher-level reasoning
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
- Bayesian group belief
- Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
- Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
- Judgment aggregation without full rationality
- A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
- Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
- Abstract Arrowian aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- Majority voting on restricted domains
- Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions
- The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
- The structure of strategy-proof social choice. I: General characterization and possibility results on median spaces
- Combining probability distributions: A critique and an annotated bibliography
- Algebraic aggregation theory
- On the theory of aggregation
- Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. I: General agendas
- A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
- Consistent Bayesian aggregation
- Arrow's theorem as a corollary
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- Marginalization and Linear Opinion Pools
- Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
- A Possibility Theorem on Majority Decisions
This page was built for publication: The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review