Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks

DOI10.1016/J.ARTINT.2009.02.001zbMath1192.68663OpenAlexW1966873207MaRDI QIDQ835836

Sanjay Modgil

Publication date: 31 August 2009

Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2009.02.001

zbMATH Keywords

preferencesnon-monotonic reasoninglogic programmingargumentationdung

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Logic programming (68N17)

Related Items (60)

Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees ⋮ An argumentative approach for handling inconsistency in prioritized Datalog ± ontologies ⋮ Preferences in artificial intelligence ⋮ Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in Twitter ⋮ Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation ⋮ On the Complexity of Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation ⋮ RAFDivider  : a distributed algorithm for computing semantics in higher-order abstract argumentation frameworks ⋮ A novel weighted defence and its relaxation in abstract argumentation ⋮ Global view on reactivity: switch graphs and their logics ⋮ AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks ⋮ Taking account of the actions of others in value-based reasoning ⋮ Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses ⋮ Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective ⋮ Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic ⋮ On efficiently estimating the probability of extensions in abstract argumentation frameworks ⋮ Dung's argumentation is essentially equivalent to classical propositional logic with the Peirce-Quine dagger ⋮ An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support ⋮ Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks ⋮ Theoretical analysis and implementation of abstract argumentation frameworks with domain assignments ⋮ Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks ⋮ A multi attack argumentation framework ⋮ Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates ⋮ Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties ⋮ A general framework for explaining the results of a multi-attribute preference model ⋮ Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method ⋮ A neural cognitive model of argumentation with application to legal inference and decision making ⋮ On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks ⋮ Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems ⋮ Revision of defeasible preferences ⋮ On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: A Logic Programming Approach ⋮ Approximating operators and semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks ⋮ Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation ⋮ Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics ⋮ Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications ⋮ Backing and Undercutting in Defeasible Logic Programming ⋮ Arguing with Valued Preference Relations ⋮ Two Roles of Preferences in Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ t-DeLP: an argumentation-based temporal defeasible logic programming framework ⋮ Reduction-Based Approaches to Implement Modgil’s Extended Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results ⋮ On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance ⋮ Semantics for higher level attacks in extended argumentation frames. I: Overview ⋮ Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques ⋮ Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs ⋮ Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks ⋮ Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks ⋮ Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics ⋮ Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation. II: Reasoning with preferences ⋮ A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks ⋮ Understanding the Abstract Dialectical Framework ⋮ Complexity of fundamental problems in probabilistic abstract argumentation: beyond independence ⋮ On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation ⋮ On three-valued acceptance conditions of abstract dialectical frameworks ⋮ Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey ⋮ Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding ⋮ Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks ⋮ Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Computational representation of practical argument
• Argumentation in artificial intelligence
• An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
• Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation
• An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
• Hierarchical Argumentation
• Nested Argumentation and Its Application to Decision Making over Actions
• On Decision Problems Related to the Preferred Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
• AI 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty

This page was built for publication: Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks