Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation

DOI10.1007/s11229-006-9063-7zbMath1112.03305OpenAlexW2121203835MaRDI QIDQ857691

Gabriella Pigozzi

Publication date: 20 December 2006

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9063-7

zbMATH Keywords

FusionBelief mergingDiscursive dilemmaDiscursive paradoxJudgment aggregation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42)

Related Items

The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation, Introduction to Judgment Aggregation, Local supermajorities, A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties, The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review, Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth, Judgement aggregation in non-classical logics, Complexity of control in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules, Merging operators on stratified belief bases equipped with argumentative inference, The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory, Scoring rules for judgment aggregation, Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others, On manipulation in merging epistemic states, Equilibria in social belief removal, Approximately classic judgement aggregation, Belief merging and judgment aggregation in fuzzy setting, Aggregating with reason(s), Geodesic merging, A measure of distance between judgment sets, Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case, A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation, The Complexity Landscape of Outcome Determination in Judgment Aggregation, Decision framing in judgment aggregation, Acceptance, aggregation and scoring rules, Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation, A Geometric Approach to Paradoxes of Majority Voting: From Anscombe’s Paradox to the Discursive Dilemma with Saari and Nurmi, Judgment aggregation in nonmonotonic logic, Logical Opposition and Collective Decisions, Which worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem, Logic based merging, Mind the Divide Surrounding Knowledge Representation, Introduction to judgment aggregation, The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications, On the dynamics of institutional agreements, Ranking judgments in Arrow's setting, Unnamed Item, Judgment aggregation and minimal change: a model of consensus formation by belief revision, Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation, Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation, Truth approximation, belief merging, and peer disagreement, Aggregating incoherent agents who disagree, Social Argument Justification: Some Mechanisms and Conditions for Their Coincidence, Majority merging by adaptive counting, Unnamed Item, Geometric models of consistent judgement aggregation, Copula-opinion pooling with complex opinions, Social pressure in opinion dynamics

Cites Work

• Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
• The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
• \(\text{DA}^2\) merging operators
• Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
• A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
• Aggregation of binary evaluations
• Propositional belief base merging or how to merge beliefs/goals coming from several sources and some links with social choice theory
• Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
• Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
• On the Semantics of Arbitration
• Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
• Belief fusion: Aggregating pedigreed belief states
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item