Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
- Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions
- Algebraic aggregation theory
- Arrow's theorem as a corollary
- Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
- Judgment aggregation without full rationality
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
- The impossibility of a paretian rational: a Bayesian perspective
- The limits of epistemic democracy
- The structure of strategy-proof social choice. I: General characterization and possibility results on median spaces
Cited in
(51)- Dynamically rational judgment aggregation: a summary
- Abstract Arrowian aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- Introduction to judgment aggregation
- Justifiable group choice
- The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
- Premise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice
- Many-valued judgment aggregation: characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary
- A general method for deciding about logically constrained issues
- Complexity of judgment aggregation
- Incoherent majorities: the McGarvey problem in judgement aggregation
- Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
- Decision framing in judgment aggregation
- Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
- A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties
- Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
- The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation
- The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications
- Quota rules for incomplete judgments
- Neutral freedom and freedom as control
- A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
- Optimal truth-tracking rules for the aggregation of incomplete judgments
- Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas
- The Condorcet set: majority voting over interconnected propositions
- Judgment aggregation rules and voting rules
- Iterative judgment aggregation
- Efficient and strategy-proof voting rules: A characterization
- Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions
- Majority voting on restricted domains
- Which worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem
- The consistency of majority rule
- Truth-tracking judgment aggregation over interconnected issues
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- Geometric models of consistent judgement aggregation
- Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth
- The median rule in judgement aggregation
- The rarity of consistent aggregators
- On manipulation in merging epistemic states
- Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
- Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation
- Judgement aggregation in non-classical logics
- Judgment aggregation in search for the truth
- Approximately classic judgement aggregation
- The problem of no hands: responsibility voids in collective decisions
- Reliable methods of judgement aggregation
- Community standards
- Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation
- The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
- Synthesizing judgements: a functional equations approach
- The limits of epistemic democracy
- The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory
This page was built for publication: Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q930478)
