Implementation without incentive compatibility: two stories with partially informed planners
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2347780
DOI10.1016/J.GEB.2015.03.007zbMATH Open1318.91034OpenAlexW2130310416MaRDI QIDQ2347780FDOQ2347780
Authors: Makoto Shimoji, Paul Schweinzer
Publication date: 8 June 2015
Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://www.york.ac.uk/media/economics/documents/discussionpapers/2012/1221.pdf
Recommendations
Cites Work
- On rationalizability in extensive games
- Full Extraction of the Surplus in Bayesian and Dominant Strategy Auctions
- Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem
- Strong belief and forward induction reasoning.
- Interactive epistemology and solution concepts for games with asymmetric information
- The Principal-Agent Relationship with an Informed Principal: The Case of Private Values
- Mechanism Design by an Informed Principal
- The Principal-Agent Relationship with an Informed Principal, II: Common Values
- Robust Mechanism Design
- Rationalizable bidding in first-price auctions.
- Exact implementation
- The Implementation of Social Choice Rules: Some General Results on Incentive Compatibility
- Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection
- Rationalizable Strategic Behavior
- Robust implementation in direct mechanisms
- Virtual Implementation in Iteratively Undominated Strategies: Complete Information
- Implementation with evidence
- Rationalizable implementation
- Implementation in differential information economies
- Implementation with Incomplete Information in Exchange Economies
- Bayesian Implementation
- Resource Allocation Under Asymmetric Information
- Hierarchies of conditional beliefs and interactive epistemology in dynamic games
- Robust implementation in general mechanisms
- Implementation with partial provability
- The theory of implementation when the planner is a player
- Robust virtual implementation: toward a reinterpretation of the Wilson doctrine
- Rationalizable outcomes of large private-value first-price discrete auctions.
- On rationalizability and beliefs in discrete private-value first-price auctions
- Transparent restrictions on beliefs and forward-induction reasoning in games with asymmetric information
Cited In (4)
This page was built for publication: Implementation without incentive compatibility: two stories with partially informed planners
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2347780)