The evolution of cooperation through institutional incentives and optional participation

From MaRDI portal
Publication:483904

DOI10.1007/S13235-013-0094-7zbMATH Open1302.91025arXiv1302.6742OpenAlexW2072163408WikidataQ39614207 ScholiaQ39614207MaRDI QIDQ483904FDOQ483904


Authors: Tatsuya Sasaki Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 17 December 2014

Published in: Dynamic Games and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Rewards and penalties are common practical tools that can be used to promote cooperation in social institutions. The evolution of cooperation under reward and punishment incentives in joint enterprises has been formalized and investigated, mostly by using compulsory public good games. Recently, Sasaki et al. (2012, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:1165-1169) considered optional participation as well as institutional incentives and described how the interplay between these mechanisms affects the evolution of cooperation in public good games. Here, we present a full classification of these evolutionary dynamics. Specifically, whenever penalties are large enough to cause the bi-stability of both cooperation and defection in cases in which participation in the public good game is compulsory, these penalties will ultimately result in cooperation if participation in the public good game is optional. The global stability of coercion-based cooperation in this optional case contrasts strikingly with the bi-stability that is observed in the compulsory case. We also argue that optional participation is not so effective at improving cooperation under rewards.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.6742




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (14)





This page was built for publication: The evolution of cooperation through institutional incentives and optional participation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q483904)