Group incentive compatibility for matching with contracts

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1036602

DOI10.1016/j.geb.2009.01.007zbMath1180.91211OpenAlexW2142558139MaRDI QIDQ1036602

John William Hatfield, Fuhito Kojima

Publication date: 13 November 2009

Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2009.01.007




Related Items

Equivalence theorem in matching with contractsThe blocking lemma and group incentive compatibility for matching with contractsLone wolves in infinite, discrete matching marketsStrategy-proofness of worker-optimal matching with continuously transferable utilityAn analysis of the German university admissions systemMatching with waiting times: the German entry-level labor market for lawyersMenu mechanismsThe structure of equilibria in trading networks with frictionsThe law of aggregate demand and welfare in the two-sided matching marketSchool choice with controlled choice constraints: hard bounds versus soft boundsOn the number of employed in the matching modelEquivalent choice functions and stable mechanismsSubstitutes and stability for matching with contractsOn the existence of a strictly strong Nash equilibrium under the student-optimal deferred acceptance algorithmGames of school choice under the Boston mechanism with general priority structuresUnilateral substitutability is necessary for doctor-optimal stabilityA necessary and sufficient condition for weak Maskin monotonicity in an allocation problem with indivisible goodsThe blocking lemma and strategy-proofness in many-to-many matchingsFinding a stable matching under type-specific minimum quotasDesigning matching mechanisms under constraints: an approach from discrete convex analysisImpossibility of stable and nonbossy matching mechanismsTwo-sided strategy-proofness in many-to-many matching marketsGroup incentive compatibility and welfare for matching with contractsMonotonicity and Nash implementation in matching markets with contractsA note on strategy-proofness from the doctor side in matching with contractsInfluence in private-goods allocationNash implementation on the basis of general priorities



Cites Work