The difference indifference makes in strategy-proof allocation of objects
From MaRDI portal
Publication:449183
Recommendations
- Strategy-proofness and identical preferences lower bound in allocation problem of indivisible objects
- Strategy-proofness and population-monotonicity for house allocation problems
- Object allocation via deferred-acceptance: strategy-proofness and comparative statics
- Some characterizations of generalized top trading cycles
- Efficiency and strategy-proofness in multi-unit object allocation problems with non-quasi-linear preferences: a positive result
Cites work
- Coalitional strategy-proof house allocation
- Exchange of indivisible goods and indifferences: the top trading absorbing sets mechanisms
- House allocation with existing tenants
- Incentive compatibility in a market with indivisible goods
- Incentive compatible allocation and exchange of discrete resources
- On Houseswapping, the Strict Core, Segmentation, and Linear Programming
- On cores and indivisibility
- On two competing mechanisms for priority-based allocation problems
- Strategy-proof assignment on the full preference domain
- Strategy-proofness and Essentially Single-valued Cores
- Strategy-proofness and the core in house allocation problems
- Strategy-proofness and the strict core in a market with indivisibilities
- Strategyproof Assignment by Hierarchical Exchange
- Strong Core and Competitive Equilibria of an Exchange Market with Indivisible Goods
- Top trading with fixed tie-breaking in markets with indivisible goods
- Weak versus strong domination in a market with indivisible goods
Cited in
(35)- The top‐trading cycles and chains solution for kidney exchange with immunosuppressants
- Achieving the maximum size for exchange problems with dichotomous preferences
- Two-sided matching with indifferences
- Matching with single-peaked preferences
- Reallocation mechanisms under distributional constraints in the full preference domain
- Top trading cycles
- On the integration of Shapley-Scarf markets
- Influence in private-goods allocation
- Mechanisms for trading durable goods
- Group incentive compatibility in the housing market problem with weak preferences
- Non-bossiness
- Exchange of indivisible goods under matroid constraints
- The core of housing markets from an agent's perspective: Is it worth sprucing up your home?
- Top trading with fixed tie-breaking in markets with indivisible goods
- Learning matters: reappraising object allocation rules when agents strategically investigate
- Strategy-proof exchange under trichotomous preferences
- Size versus truthfulness in the house allocation problem
- Gale’s Fixed Tax for Exchanging Houses
- Two necessary conditions for strategy-proofness: on what domains are they also sufficient?
- Ex-post incentive compatible and individually rational assignments in housing markets with interdependent values
- Strategy-proofness and essentially single-valued cores revisited
- Truthful implementation and preference aggregation in restricted domains
- Strategy-proofness and identical preferences lower bound in allocation problem of indivisible objects
- Exchange of indivisible goods and indifferences: the top trading absorbing sets mechanisms
- Some characterizations of generalized top trading cycles
- Stable and efficient resource allocation under weak priorities
- Stability of an allocation of objects
- An impossibility result for housing markets with fractional endowments
- A new allocation rule for the housing market problem with ties
- Algorithms for Pareto optimal exchange with bounded exchange cycles
- Age-based preferences in paired kidney exchange
- Multi resource allocation with partial preferences
- Housing markets since Shapley and Scarf
- Stable allocations in discrete exchange economies
- Matching with indifferences: a comparison of algorithms in the context of course allocation
This page was built for publication: The difference indifference makes in strategy-proof allocation of objects
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q449183)
